Tuesday, September 28, 1999

Drunkenness as a Constitutional Defence - The Record editor - Sep 28, 1999 - by Randall F. More



September 28, 1999 


Letter to the Editor - The Record


RE: Drunkenness as a Defence


               
As reported in the September 24th edition of The Record, an Ontario court judge, Judge Patricia Wallace, ruled that it would be unconstitutional for an accused not to be permitted to use drunkenness as a defence for a violent crime. This is truly a ridiculous ruling! For drunkenness to be considered a legitimate defence for assault, rape, murder, or any other heinous crime is absurd and makes a farce and mockery of our justice system and our constitution.

One of the most serious problems that we face in society today is that, children and adults alike, are increasingly freed from being held accountable for their behaviour and conduct. This recent ruling will certainly go a long way to perpetuate this already horrific and growing societal problem. (Apart from the more universal societal problem, such a ruling is also a travesty for the individual victims who are violated but where nobody becomes properly accountable for the crime.) Let’s get back to some common sense justice.


Yours truly



Randall F. More, P. Eng