Thursday, June 19, 2014

Abortion – “Bring on Canada’s new abortion debate” - review by Randall F. More



June 19, 2014

Messrs Paul Saurette, Associate Professor & Kelly Gordon
University of Ottawa
75 Laurier Avenue East
Ottawa, Ontario
K1N 6N5
613-562-5700

Dear Messrs Saurette & Gordon

Re: Abortion – “Bring on Canada’s new abortion debate” by Paul Saurette & Kelly Gordon

I write in response to the aforementioned article published in “The Star,” May 20, 2014. The extent of your apparent fervour in the pro-choice position of the abortion debate is rather disconcerting.

Prior to publishing your book, “The Changing Voice of the Canadian Anti-Abortion Movement,” it is my hope that you will have fully considered the following:

·      Doesn’t any reference to "pro-choice" imply that there is an ethical choice involved in the decision to abort a baby? How can there be an ethical choice between killing and not killing when a child is involved?

·    Isn’t it disingenuous to attempt to balance a mother's right with the right of an unborn baby and to believe that such a balance can be achieved by killing one of those lives? Shouldn’t the right to life be paramount to all other rights and the right to choose be clearly and resolutely superseded by that very precious right to life?

·       Isn’t it a rather gruesome reality that the destiny of any "unwanted" unborn child is ultimately left to the decision of a pro-abortionist doctor? Would any of us have wanted our own lives entrusted to a person who considers killing us as a reasonable alternative to life?

·      Isn’t there a problem when, now, statistically in this country, the most dangerous place to be is in the mother's womb?

·    However euphemistically described, isn’t abortion still the killing of the unborn child; isn’t murder by any other name still murder?

·   Isn’t there a serious societal problem when virtually any social, economic, or psychological condition or circumstance can be used as justification for the killing of the unborn child? Isn’t it true that abortion is not really the solution to any problem; it is ultimately the elimination of another human being perceived to be the problem?

·   Even though pro-abortionists argue that abortion must be legalized and easy access made available to everyone in order to reduce deaths associated with back alley abortions, shouldn’t it be acknowledged that, back alley or not, there is at least one death in every abortion?

·     For doctors who have committed to honouring the Hippocratic Oath, haven’t the abortionist doctors cast themselves in the paradoxical position of being both healers and exterminators? Side by side they exist; obstetricians in one room, abortionists in the next.

·    Doesn’t the unborn child, by the very reason of his or her physical and mental immaturity, need our special protection and care, not our killing.

·    Shouldn’t our government lead our nation in establishing laws which will clearly protect the precious, voiceless, unborn lives from the moment of their conception?

·     Wouldn’t adoption be the best alternative for a “problem” pregnancy? Instead of abortion, for the never ending stream of childless couples in Canada, wouldn’t it be better to provide the wonderful opportunity for adoption for those who would dearly love to raise an adopted son or daughter?

Pro-choice proponents often describe the pro-life advocates as wanting to deny reproductive rights for women. This is not the essence of the pro-life position. Much more profoundly, the pro-life advocates are really only wanting to defend what they believe is the unborn’s right to live. (The young female babies in their mothers’ wombs, about to be aborted, will, by their own imminent death, be denied their own reproductive rights as young women. Is this right?) 

I concede that the position which I hold is somewhat for selfish reasons. Yes, I defend the life of the unborn but, just as importantly, I am also concerned for our nation. I believe that there is a God-given mandate and directive regarding the unborn. I also believe that we cannot continue to mock God on such an issue without bringing judgment on our nation because ultimately… it will be at our own peril.  


"Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, and before you were born I consecrated you" (Jeremiah 1:5).


"The Lord called Me from the womb; From the body of My mother He named Me" (Isaiah 49:1).


"For You formed my inward parts; You wove me in my mother's womb. I will give thanks to You, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made" (Psalm 139:13-14).


"I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing; choose life that both you and your seed may live" (Deuteronomy 30:19).


"Deliver those who are being taken away to death, and those who are staggering to slaughter" (Proverbs 24:11).



My hope is that you will consider advocating with those who desire to honour the life of the unborn from the moment of conception. Thank you for your consideration.

Your comments would be most welcome.
                                                                                                                    

Yours truly


                           
Randall F. More, P. Eng.


cc The Star