NBC - Meet the Press - Roe vs. Wade - Jun 22, 2022

 

NBC – Meet the Press – Roe vs. Wade – Jun 22, 2022

 Mr. Chuck Todd

After interviewing Asa Hutchison (R-Arkansas Governor) you followed up by asking Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) if she agreed with Hutchison in “forcing a woman to carry out a pregnancy?”

You would not likely have asked in that manner if Hutchison had still been present. Notwithstanding your own prejudice, wouldn’t it have been fairer and more honouring of your guest, Hutchison, to ask AOC, instead, “Do you agree with Hutchison in wanting to preserve and protect the lives of unborn babies?” which is essentially what he did say.

NOTES:
When Democrats Warren, Pelosi, Schumer, Schiff, Brazile, Biden, Harris, and others speak about the issue, they invariably speak with vitriol and derision and are quick to denigrate the views of half the nation who desire to protect the lives of the defenceless unborn.

Wouldn’t pro-abortionists be wise to recognize that a woman’s reproductive rights more properly end at the moment of conception?

Pro-life women (and men) do not advocate the pro-life position for any self-serving purpose; they do it as advocates for the lives of the unborn.

Democrats demand safe abortions…. but there is at least one death in every abortion. Abortion stops a beating heart.

What many do not realize is that we have all been fairly warned that no nation on earth will survive intact if it continues to sanction the killing of its own children.

Randall F. More, P. Eng.

Honourable Robert Rae - Canadian Ambassador to United Nations - Russia/Ukraine - by Randall F. More

February 28, 2022

Attention: Honourable Robert Rae

Canadian Ambassador to the United Nations

canada.un@international.gc.ca

212-848-1100

RE: Russia/Ukraine

The only people on earth who agree with what Putin is doing is Putin himself and some step-in-line-obedient Russians…  all while every person on earth knows that Ukraine cannot withstand the onslaught.

How is it that the world allows this to happen without providing any international fighting forces… or bombing from the air or using submarine mounted missiles so as not to sacrifice any military personnel?

Sadly, this all seems to convey that if a nation does not happen to be a member of NATO, then too bad, so sad… and any powerful, tyrannical dictator can invade any other country violating all international laws. This terrible lack of action does not bode well for the world now or over the long term.

If NATO does nothing, how is it that the UN also does nothing while a sovereign nation and its people are attacked and destroyed by outside barbaric forces?

This is one of the most serious issues ever faced since the inception of the United Nations and yet it seems that the UN is strangely impotent to defend and support liberty, freedom, and democracy. Why does the UN permit this to happen? Why does the UN not do what is required?

There may be no limit for the very dangerous dictator… Georgia, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia… then Finland, Sweden… then Poland, Slovakia, Moldova, Hungary, Romania.

It will be far too late for the UN after Putin accomplishes his first objective. This seems to be incredibly short sighted and lacking in every regard.

Your written response would be most appreciated.

The UN’s very prompt action response to the situation would be even more appreciated.

Yours truly

Randall F. More, P. Eng.